Hunting Survey Receives Criticism for Glaring Deficiencies

Image of hunters for Festival of Hunting

Rural campaigners have criticised a hunting survey linked to a controversial review of the activity in North Wales for containing ‘glaring deficiencies’. The survey is reported to have made incorrect claims about hunting law in the UK, despite being approved for publication by the Police Crime Commissioner for North Wales.

The Countryside Alliance has written to North Wales’s Police Crime Commissioner, Andy Dunbobbin, expressing serious concerns over the transparency and format of the survey, which is running online via the commissioner’s own website.

The Alliance has raised questions about the ‘Easy Read’ survey, which offers participants an explanation on what ‘difficult words’ mean. Tim Bonner, the Alliance Chief Executive claimed the questions “misrepresent the law regarding hunting” as one incorrectly claims “Since 2004 fox hunting with more than 2 dogs is against the law in England and Wales.” It is illegal to hunt with any number of dogs. Two dogs may be used only to flush to guns.

Additionally, the survey does not ask participants to provide any information as to where they are from, or whether they have ever been to North Wales, sparking fears the survey could be hijacked by animal rights activists and in turn influence local policing policy and priorities.


Apart from participants who have police incident numbers, there is also no way in which the evidence provided by those taking part in the survey can be verified.

The survey comes after the Labour PCC invited tender bids of up to £20,000 in taxpayers’ money from contractors to undertake an independent review of hunting in the region.

Members of Cyfiawnder, the Social Inclusion Research Institute at Wrexham Glyndwr University successfully bid to undertake the review on Mr. Dunbobbin’s behalf.  They will look at how the police have responded to recorded, investigated and prosecuted crimes linked with hunting. Among the team members carrying out the research is Dr. Caroline Gorden, who sits on the Research Advisory Committee of the Vegan Society, an organisation that advocates for an end to meat and dairy consumption.

Mr. Bonner said:

The survey would suggest that those conducting the research have little knowledge of hunting before or after the Hunting Act was enforced, or indeed the law in this area.”

Whatever the results of the survey, they cannot be considered as a robust and reliable reflection of the situation in the North Wales Police Force area, as the data cannot be properly verified and assessed. Consequently, it is hard to see how any recommendations based on flawed research can be well founded. To add insult to injury, it is the already hard-pressed taxpayer who is funding this project.”

He added:

In a country where we enjoy policing by consent, it is astonishing that such a divisive review, the deficiencies of which are all too evident, should have been approved. Far from uniting communities and improving relations between the police and rural communities, it serves only to divide. Perhaps resources would be better directed at assessing the very real problem of rural crime in North Wales”.

The Countryside Alliance confirmed that the hunting community, and the rural community more widely, would “happily participate in objective and open research” but not “with an exercise as deeply flawed as this”.

The plans to hold a review into the way hunts are policed in North Wales, announced in March this year, were previously slammed by the Alliance as an “unnecessary political vanity project”. They accused Mr. Dunbobbin of having “prejudices against rural people” and called for him to spend taxpayers’ money elsewhere.

Mr. Dunbobbin also attracted criticism from his Plaid Cymru predecessor Arfon Jones, who said the issue fell outside his remit.

Mr Jones, a former police inspector, said:

He’s naive to get involved in an operational policing issue, which he shouldn’t do anyway”.

He added:

If he was that concerned about the way hunts are policed then he should’ve asked for advice from Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary on how to go about it and whether they could assist with a review.

You can’t have just anybody coming in to do a review of operational police matters because there’s police procedures and confidentiality involved.”

Andy Dunbobbin, North Wales Police and Crime Commissioner commented:

We recognise the importance of making sure our review into the policing of hunting in North Wales is as robust as possible, and that we hear from all sides in the debate. A crucial way of ensuring it is as accessible as possible is by making a version that can be easily understood by people with learning disabilities and other people who have difficulty with reading. This ‘Easy Read’ format may not have some of the finer details of legislation around hunting that the full version contains, but this simpler interpretation enables the survey to be more accessible to more people.

To ensure the research base for the review into the policing of hunting is as representative as possible, efforts will be made to detect and extract false entries in the process of analysing data. Moreover, the review considers data from a range of sources, from survey respondents, incident and case file reviews, as well as interviews with key respondents.

The contract to undertake the review was awarded following a competitive exercise to a team of researchers who demonstrated in their submission a commitment to working to the highest standards of academic integrity to ensure their findings are evidence based. The review team, led by Professor Iolo Madoc-Jones, are highly experienced criminal justice practitioners and academics with diverse backgrounds, which will add credibility to the review and its findings.

We believe that the processes in place across the language used for the review, the professionals involved, and the research base that it will draw from will all ensure a credible, robust and fair review into the policing of hunting in North Wales. I would urge those on both sides of the debate to remain engaged and contribute to this process and make sure their voice is heard.”

For more equestrian stories, visit our news pages here.

Feature image for illustration only.

Related posts