Man Handed Six-Month Suspended Jail Sentence for Mistreatment of 31 Horses

A number of equines in the care of Alun Lloyd suffered with poor bodily condition, weight loss and dental issues all problems amid the neglected horses in his care

Alun Lloyd of Sunny Hill, Llanfyrnach, has been found guilty of nine Animal Welfare Act offences split over two separate cases. He was sentenced on Tuesday (22 December) at Llanelli Magistrates Court, having previously failed to attend court.

In addition to a six-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, Lloyd was disqualified from the keeping and owning of horses for ten years, and given £1,500 in fines and costs. He cannot appeal the decade-long ban for five years.

Some 31 horses in the care of Lloyd were being kept in an unsuitable environment, based in several fields at Esgyr Fawr in Cippyn where ragwort was prevalent.

Further offences specifically related to seven of the horses owned by Lloyd – six of whom his failure to act caused suffering unnecessarily. One was suffering due to poor condition, while a further five had poor body condition and weight loss. One of the horses was also suffering with an ulcerated sarcoid, while another also had serious dental issues.

Lloyd also failed to meet the needs of three horses needing effective lice control, two requiring treatment for rain scald, while one was also not given necessary veterinary care and attention for respiratory distress.

Sadly, four horses had to be put to sleep due to the extent of their condition and not responding to intensive treatment.

Alun Lloyd of Sunny Hill, Llanfyrnach, was found guilty of nine Animal Welfare Act offences

He now has 28 days to make arrangements for horses still in his care – after being told by the court that he may not keep or own the animals for the next decade.

The RSPCA was contacted by Dyfed Powys Police about the state of horses at Esgyr Fawr – and launched an investigation. Officers from the animal welfare charity say conditions had not improved despite offering advice on previous occasions and that court proceedings followed “bad husbandry” and a failure to respect the basic needs of 31 horses.